TMJC assistance
Want TMJC to help with this vehicle?
Sourcing, consignment and valuationContinue to the main TMJC website and speak directly with the collection team.
Variant
Factory evidence confirms the Eunos Roadster S-Limited as a December 1992, 1,000-car NA6CE special. Specs, originality and buying checks.

TMJC guide
Factory evidence confirms the Eunos Roadster S-Limited as a December 1992, 1,000-car NA6CE special. Specs, originality and buying checks.
The Eunos Roadster S-Limited is a genuine Japanese-market NA6CE limited grade, not merely a nickname used by importers. Mazda's own current Classic programme names S-Limited in its NA6CE grade tables and places it in the limited-car group. Mazda also confirms that the MX-5 was sold in Japan as the Eunos Roadster.
Mazda’s own MX-5 chronology now resolves two of those questions directly. It records the S Limited in December 1992, says it used the chassis from the S Special, identifies a black body with red interior, and gives a production quantity of 1,000 units. Exact-grade databases still do useful work on engine, gearbox and dimensions, while period-catalogue specialist material adds detail around Bilstein, BBS and Nardi equipment. The important distinction is now narrower: the launch month and 1,000-car quantity are manufacturer-primary; the complete equipment matrix still benefits from original brochure-level evidence.
For UK readers, the naming is the first potential trap. Mazda says that Japanese sales of the MX-5 began in September 1989 and that the car was known there as the Eunos Roadster. The S-Limited therefore belongs under the same first-generation NA family as the UK Mazda MX-5, but its exact specification should be checked against Japanese-market evidence.
Its place in the first-generation Roadster family is straightforward:
For the wider chassis story, see the Mazda MX-5 NA reference.
Mazda's current NA Roadster parts-information table is unusually helpful because it separates regular models from limited cars.
In that table, Standard, Special Package and V-Special sit under the regular-model heading. J-Limited, S-Special and S-Limited sit under the limited-car heading. S-Limited appears in the NA6CE-200001 to 300000 row.
That gives two strong conclusions without needing to rely on marketplace copy:
The table is not a complete build decoder, though. It is part of a present-day parts/restoration service with its own eligibility rules, so the serial ranges should not be treated as proof that every number in the range corresponds to an S-Limited.
This distinction is particularly useful beside the Eunos Roadster V-Special. Mazda's current table places V-Special in the regular-model group, whereas S-Limited is explicitly in the limited-car group.
December 1992 is now manufacturer-confirmed. Mazda’s own English-language MX-5 chronology records a limited-edition S Limited in December 1992. It also says the car used the chassis from the S Special, with black body paint and a red interior, and gives the production quantity as 1,000 units.
The surrounding factory chronology is slightly less tidy. Mazda’s English MX-5 chronology dates the S Special to July 1992, while Mazda Newsroom Japan’s Roadster genealogy dates the S Special launch to September 1992. Both official records still put the S Special before the S Limited. The disagreement therefore affects the predecessor’s exact launch month, not the S Limited’s December 1992 identity.
Atelier Nii’s period-literature archive and Goo-net’s exact-grade record independently agree on December 1992. Japanese Performance & Nostalgia gives a broader August 1992 to August 1993 range; that broader database range should not override Mazda’s own December launch entry.
For an individual imported car, build date, Japanese paperwork and UK registration date can still differ. The model-level launch date is settled; the exact build date of a particular car remains a vehicle-specific question.
The exact December 1992 Goo-net grade record gives a coherent late-NA6CE specification:
| Item | S-Limited record |
|---|---|
| Chassis | E-NA6CE |
| Engine | B6, water-cooled inline-four DOHC |
| Capacity | 1,597 cc |
| Power | 120 PS at 6,500 rpm |
| Torque | 14.0 kg-m / 137.3 Nm at 5,500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | FR / rear-wheel drive |
| LSD | Standard in the catalogue record |
| Kerb weight | 960 kg |
| Dimensions | 3970 x 1675 x 1235 mm |
| New price | ¥2,350,000 |
Japanese Performance & Nostalgia independently agrees on the important mechanical points: E-NA6CE, 1,597 cc, 120 PS, five-speed manual and 960 kg.
These are strong exact-grade specifications, but both are modern specialist/catalogue databases rather than the factory brochure itself. They are useful for a buying reference, while remaining one step below a primary Mazda technical sheet.
Yes. Mazda’s own MX-5 chronology gives 1,000 units. The factory chronology records the S Limited as a December 1992 limited edition and explicitly places the run at 1,000 cars.
That primary record also explains why the long-standing 1,000 figure has been so consistent elsewhere. Response.jp’s retrospective of contemporary Roadster catalogues describes a nationwide 1,000-car release, while Atelier Nii’s model history, The MX5 Restorer and the TMJC-attributed H19RPE advert independently repeat the same quantity.
The useful distinction is no longer whether 1,000 is merely enthusiast folklore. It is manufacturer-confirmed. What still deserves separate evidence is the complete factory equipment matrix: Mazda’s short chronology names the S-Special chassis basis and black/red presentation, but it does not enumerate every wheel, damper, trim and option detail.
The S-Limited is usually recognised by its dramatic contrast: Brilliant Black exterior, red interior and gold BBS wheels.
The TMJC-associated H19RPE listing describes precisely that combination: Brilliant Black paint, red leather and original BBS alloy wheels. A separate MX-5 specialist description of another S-Limited also records black paint, red leather, gold BBS wheels and a yellow strut brace.
That makes the combination a strong identification cue, but a thirty-plus-year-old car can acquire the same appearance through restoration or conversion. Wheels can be refinished, leather can be retrimmed, steering wheels can be swapped and braces can be repainted.
For a car being sold at an S-Limited premium, appearance should support the identity rather than substitute for it. Better evidence includes:
The Atelier Nii archive catalogues a period S-Limited brochure, but its detailed pages are not cited here. The equipment list therefore stays limited to details supported by the sources below rather than being filled from enthusiast memory.
A surviving Car & Classic listing associated with The Matt Johnston Collection records H19RPE as a 1993 S-Limited Eunos Roadster.
The advert records:
It also says the car had an uprated Momo steering wheel, and describes rear-arch and inner/outer-sill repair work completed in December 2024.
Those details are useful precisely because they show how a real surviving UK-import S-Limited may differ from a frozen brochure image. The Momo steering wheel is not evidence against the underlying grade; it is a later component that should be documented. Likewise, repaired sills do not change the car's identity, but the quality and extent of structural repair matter greatly to value.
The advert's mileage, registration, repair history and condition claims belong to H19RPE only. They are not model-wide specification.
The Car & Classic listing is the surviving TMJC-attributed record cited here; no first-party TMJC listing for H19RPE is cited.
Mazda’s own chronology makes the relationship clearer: the S Limited used the chassis from the S Special. That is stronger evidence than simply saying the two cars look mechanically similar.
There is one chronology wrinkle worth keeping visible. Mazda’s English MX-5 chronology dates the S Special to July 1992, while Mazda Newsroom Japan’s genealogy says September 1992. Both place it before the S Limited’s manufacturer-confirmed December 1992 launch, so the sequence is clear even if Mazda’s own archive is inconsistent on the predecessor’s exact month.
Response.jp’s period-catalogue retrospective says the S Limited retained S-Special-style suspension tuning with Bilstein dampers and a strut tower brace, then added its distinctive gold-spoke BBS/red-interior/Brilliant-Black presentation. Those detailed equipment claims are strong specialist evidence, but they should not be expanded beyond what the reviewed catalogue material supports.
For a buyer, establish the exact Japanese grade from chassis/build documentation first, then use the visible S-Limited equipment as corroboration. A generic S-Special specification should not be used to fill every S-Limited evidence gap.
These two names answer different collector questions.
The V-Special was a continuing Japanese-market grade associated with tan leather and NARDI wood, and Mazda's own current table places it in the regular-model group.
The S-Limited is explicitly placed in Mazda's limited-car group and belongs to the late NA6CE sporting end of the range. It is therefore much more reasonable to speak of an S-Limited as a limited edition than to apply that phrase automatically to every V-Special.
That difference matters when valuing an imported car. A correct V-Special should be judged against its grade/build-period specification; an S-Limited also carries a rarity/edition claim that needs evidence.
Do not back-project the later R-Limited specification onto this car.
The Eunos Roadster R-Limited belongs to the later 1.8-litre NA8C period and has its own period Mazda brochure evidence. Drivetrain, differential and suspension details from that 1995 car are not substitutes for S-Limited evidence merely because both are Japanese-market limited Roadsters.
The S-Limited's collector appeal is rooted in the last part of the 1.6-litre NA6CE story.
A useful inspection separates identity, originality, condition and history.
Start with the chassis number and Japanese-market paperwork. The car should fit the late NA6CE context and the grade claim should be supported by more than wheels and upholstery.
Check:
Once identity is established, ask which visible pieces are original, restored or replaced.
For the familiar S-Limited presentation, inspect the evidence behind:
A replacement part is not automatically a negative. The important thing is whether the seller describes the car accurately and whether removed factory parts or invoices survive.
NA Roadster shell condition can outweigh trim rarity. Pay particular attention to:
H19RPE is a useful example of why this matters: its seller explicitly disclosed substantial sill/arch repair work. That can be positive if properly executed and documented, but it deserves close inspection rather than being hidden behind the phrase “rust free”.
The S-Limited is still an early-1990s NA Roadster. Check the actual car rather than assuming rarity exempts it from ordinary maintenance.
Look for coherent records covering:
For a Japanese import, the strongest history joins the Japanese and UK periods rather than beginning at UK registration.
Useful evidence can include Japanese service records, export certificate, auction or import documents, kilometre/mileage conversion notes, early UK MOTs and a continuous invoice trail.
A premium should buy evidence, not just a colour scheme.
The strongest cars should combine:
A cosmetically perfect black/red car with weak chassis evidence is less convincing than a correctly documented S-Limited with sensible restoration work. Likewise, a car with non-original wheels or steering wheel may still be an excellent S-Limited if its underlying identity is clear and the modifications are reversible and disclosed.
Before paying for rarity, try to answer all of these:
Mazda’s own chronology confirms the S-Limited as a December 1992, 1,000-car limited edition, while Mazda Classic independently supports its NA6CE limited-grade identity. The complete trim and option matrix still depends on brochure-level evidence.
Editorial information
Research and editorial from TMJC Garage.
Research and editorialTMJC Garage
Reviewed byMatt Johnston
Last reviewed15 September 2026
Published byThe Matt Johnston Collection
Model lineage
TMJC assistance
Continue to the main TMJC website and speak directly with the collection team.
Sell, consign or source
Continue with TMJC for a discreet conversation, professional presentation and collector-focused support.
Enquire now