TMJC assistance
Want TMJC to help with this vehicle?
Sourcing, consignment and valuationContinue to the main TMJC website and speak directly with the collection team.
Model
TVR 280i history: Tasmin naming, 2.8-litre Ford V6, UK body styles, gearbox choices and buying checks.

TMJC guide
TVR 280i history: Tasmin naming, 2.8-litre Ford V6, UK body styles, gearbox choices and buying checks.
The TVR 280i is the Ford-V6 branch of TVR's angular Wedge family. For a later UK car, the name is not just enthusiast shorthand: TVR's own October 1984 UK price list offered a 280i Convertible, 280i Fixed Head and 280i Plus Two Fixed Head.
The complication is that the same family did not start life with that name. When the shape appeared in 1980, TVR called it the Tasmin, and a surviving reproduction of TVR's October 1982 UK price list still uses Tasmin for the 2.8-litre cars. The period evidence now narrows the UK transition further, but it still does not prove one exact rename date.
Tasmin describes the original 1980 model and remains a valid lineage name; 280i is the clearest period-factory identity for the later Ford 2.8-litre V6 cars. For a UK-market 1985 fixed-head example, 280i Fixed Head is the wording TVR itself was using for the equivalent car by late 1984.
TVR's own paperwork is more useful than trying to infer the answer from modern adverts.
| Period source | Name used by TVR |
|---|---|
| January 1980 launch material | TVR Tasmin |
| October 1980 UK price list | Tasmin, Tasmin Convertible, Tasmin +2 |
| May 1981 UK price list | Tasmin, Tasmin Convertible, Tasmin +2 |
| October 1982 UK price list | Tasmin 2.8 Convertible, Fixed Head and Plus 2 |
| October 1984 UK price list | 280i Fixed Head, 280i Convertible, 280i Plus Two Fixed Head |
The surviving UK sales evidence therefore brackets the formal change after October 1982 and by October 1984.
A contemporary _Motor Sport_ retrospective in 1984 says the 2.8-litre car became the 280i when TVR introduced the cheaper four-cylinder 200. The TVR Car Club's later model history places the Ford-engined rename around the arrival of the 350i in 1983. Those accounts are useful, and a June 1983 _Motor Sport_ road test still called its car a Tasmin Series Two. But that is contemporary press terminology rather than a factory UK price list. The surviving sales material therefore supports an October 1982-to-October 1984 changeover window without proving the exact switch date.
So a seller describing a later car as a Tasmin 280i is not necessarily describing a different machine. It is usually combining the family name with the later derivative name. For provenance work, however, the car's original market paperwork and chassis documentation should take priority over whichever label has become popular in classifieds.
Series Two is not just a label invented by modern classifieds. A contemporary Motor Sport road test in June 1983 explicitly described its normally aspirated, fuel-injected 2.8-litre coupé as a Tasmin Series Two.
The same magazine had tested an earlier convertible in 1981, giving a useful period comparison rather than a retrospective specification table. The 1981 car used a standard Ford four-speed manual gearbox. The 1983 Series Two coupé used the Ford/Capri five-speed gearbox, and Motor Sport described two years of detailed refinements and subtle modifications between the cars.
What the surviving evidence does not give us is equally important. No TVR factory document currently establishes one chassis-number breakpoint for Series One versus Series Two, nor that every Series Two body style and market received exactly the same transmission at the same time.
That caution is reinforced by TVR's October 1984 UK price list. It lists both Automatic Transmission and a 5 Speed Gearbox among the optional extras available on the range, with the five-speed specifically noted as standard on 350i models. So a five-speed is unquestionably period-correct for a later Ford-V6 Wedge, but Series Two = five-speed on every car is stronger than the evidence allows.
For a buyer, Series Two should therefore be treated as useful period terminology for the evolved car, not as a substitute for the chassis number, build paperwork, body style, market and fitted gearbox.
The defining engine is Ford's fuel-injected 2.8-litre Cologne V6. TVR's January 1980 Tasmin launch material already describes the new angular car with that engine, and the TVR Car Club records the 280i capacity as 2792 cc.
That does not mean every Wedge can be described from one 280i specification sheet. TVR also sold the 200 with a four-cylinder Ford engine, then developed Rover-V8 cars such as the 350i and later larger-capacity derivatives. Running changes and export requirements further complicate the picture.
The 280i is therefore best understood as the later name for the Ford 2.8-litre V6 branch, not as another word for every angular TVR of the 1980s.
TVR's October 1984 UK price list shows three 280i body descriptions:
That factory wording is useful when checking a car's original identity. Coupe is a perfectly understandable modern description of a fixed-roof car, but Fixed Head is the period sales term visible in the late-1984 UK list.
The range also explains why body style should not be inferred from the 280i badge alone. A correct description needs the model plus the actual body and original market documentation.
The Wedge shape arrived before Peter Wheeler controlled TVR. Official TVR history places the Tasmin launch in 1980, during the Lilley era, while Wheeler took control later. Under Wheeler, the same basic architecture was developed into the Rover-V8 350i and the increasingly powerful Wedge derivatives that followed.
The Tasmin was the original angular model, the 280i became the name of the Ford-V6 branch, and Wedge is the broader enthusiast description for the angular family. They overlap, but they are not exact synonyms for every year, engine and body.
Explore the broader company story on the TVR marque page.
A 1987 _Motor Sport_ factory feature says the V6 was dropped from the UK market by the end of 1985 as buyers increasingly chose the V8 cars. The same report explains that export business remained important and that TVR's US sales, which had begun in 1983, used V6 engines because the V8 federalisation programme was still more difficult.
An unqualified “280i ended in 1985” statement is too broad. It works as a description of the UK-market change reported by _Motor Sport_, not as a universal production cutoff. Later specialist histories carry the 280i further in export-market chronology.
For an individual car, especially one imported from another market, establish where it was originally supplied and use market-appropriate factory material.
One of the most useful ownership distinctions on a Wedge is also one of the easiest to miss. The visible body is glassfibre, but the structure underneath is a separate steel chassis.
That means the familiar line that a glassfibre TVR does not rust is only half the story. The outer shell itself does not corrode like a steel monocoque, but chassis condition remains important. A buyer should not take clean bodywork as evidence that the structure beneath it is equally sound.
The TVR Car Club's technical archive also shows why a generic Wedge checklist needs care: the family spans different engines, bodies and suspension arrangements, and it preserves separate 280i/350i workshop and parts documentation. Where originality matters, the car should be checked against the correct period and derivative rather than a single all-Wedge specification.
TMJC's own 1985 280i Coupe is a useful example. Its first-party history records the original specification as the 2.8-litre Cologne V6 with a five-speed manual, but the restored car now carries a later 2.9-litre Cologne V6.
That later engine changes the car's current mechanical specification. It does not turn the car into a 290S, nor does it make 2.9 litres the factory specification of a 280i.
The same principle applies to badges, wheels, trim and other parts that can be changed over decades. Establish the underlying identity first, then describe modifications separately.
Start with evidence that is difficult to misread or swap between cars:
For a collector-grade car, this is the same provenance discipline that applies to any low-volume classic: distinguish the model it left the factory as from the specification it has accumulated since.
The Matt Johnston Collection has handled a restored 1985 RHD 280i Coupe. Its history is particularly useful because the car does not pretend to be untouched: the later 2.9-litre engine is documented as a replacement, and the body-off restoration is part of the story rather than something hidden behind a generic original label.
It shows how a 280i's identity can remain stable even while an individual car's mechanical specification evolves.
For a late UK car, do not assume a five-speed from the 280i badge alone.
TVR Engineering's October 1984 UK price list is unusually useful here because it separates body style from transmission choice. It priced the 280i Convertible at £13,916.69, the 280i Fixed Head at £14,664.53 and the 280i Plus Two Fixed Head at £15,809.98. Beneath those cars, the factory listed Automatic Transmission at £545.98 and a 5 Speed Gearbox at £383.23 among the optional extras; the five-speed line specifically says it was standard on 350i models.
That is good evidence that a five-speed was a period factory choice for a 280i. It is not evidence that every 280i left Blackpool with one, and the price sheet does not by itself identify the standard gearbox fitted to every market or production period.
TMJC's 1985 Coupe is a useful car-specific example. Its first-party history describes its original specification as the 2.8-litre Cologne V6 with a five-speed manual, before the later 2.9-litre engine swap. The period TVR price list supports that combination as factory-era equipment, but the exact car's invoice, build record or equivalent provenance remains the right evidence for proving how it was ordered.
This is also why Fixed Head matters when reading period paperwork: it is TVR's own October 1984 UK wording for the two-seat closed 280i that modern adverts will usually call a coupé.
Editorial information
Research and editorial from TMJC Garage.
Research and editorialTMJC Garage
Reviewed byMatt Johnston
Last reviewed20 September 2026
Published byThe Matt Johnston Collection
Model lineage
TMJC photography






TMJC assistance
Continue to the main TMJC website and speak directly with the collection team.
Sell, consign or source
Continue with TMJC for a discreet conversation, professional presentation and collector-focused support.
Enquire now